Rebuttal Against the Female-First Advocates.

To start off, I would like to ask any female-first advocates to not bomb my house upon finishing this article. I honestly attempted to be as non-biased as possible.

~David Yun

______________________________________________________________________

In our current society, there are and were many problems; racism, gayness, and human rights. But the cause that has created by-far, the most ruckus is the gender-equality argument. I, for one, agree to some of the demands. But by my standards, gender-equality does not equal ladies first. Gender equality should not be only males nor should it be only females. Some of the requests by some of these groups are quite preposterous like changing the spelling of "woman" so that it is no longer a derivative of the word "man". One suggestion was "womun" and with the plural being womin.

Some females believe that because the man has been the ruler for countless centuries, that it is now there turn but I believe that there really is no point in crying over spilt milk. Instead of demanding that women be automatically rulers, they should step up and do something Hilary Clinton-esque.

One instance of a female first advocate advocating that especially pissed me off was when I encountered a woman in the mens' room at Chapters. Now before I elaborate, I would like you to picture a man in the womens' room. Can you picture the ruckus that I am? This woman not only was in the wrong place, she made it blatantly obvious that this was intentional by exclaiming, "Crickey! Imagine that! A woman in the mens room."

All in all, I am not really against the gender-equality issue but am against the female-first advocates. To give your insight on the issue either post a comment or email the crew at thejdmblog@gmail.com

~David Yun